Hot Management Info for 2002

December - Politics

November - Photosynthesis For Planners

October - Why Should Anyone Be Led By You?

September - Be Careful With Your Values

August - Multiple Permits - Multiple Jurisdictions

July - Workplace Of The Future

June - Turnover

May - Getting Your Department From Good To Great

April - What Are You Reading?

March - Wisdom Of Jack Welch

January - Productivity And Pride


December 2002 - Politics

The Complete Management Course for Planning Directors has just completed courses in Kansas City, New Orleans and Raleigh, with eight more cities to go in the current series. What struck me so far is a reminder that planning and planners must have good political instincts and political skills. I'm currently focusing on the following 10 key ideas:

  1. Don't try to change your elected officials-it doesn't work. Instead see what you can do to adjust your style or approach to each elected official.
  2. Timing may not be everything-but it is close. Keep your list of ideas or initiatives on the ready and be prepared when the timing is right.
  3. Don't try any major initiatives during an election. This is a time to lay low. It is not a good time to try to adopt a new General Plan.
  4. Focus your efforts on products and services with high visibility and support. This will also give you the support you need to slip in the other things.
  5. Be both a leader and a follower. Help articulate the vision of the elected officials and the community. Be careful; don't stand between the elected official and the camera.
  6. Do a political analysis of your community and situation.
    • Find out the goals of each elected official.
    • Figure out the personality type of each elected official and use it to adjust your approach or style.
    • Use the boss interpreter concept. You may not always know what the elected official is up to but their interpreters often do. Also, you can get messages to or influence the elected official through their interpreters.
  7. Help your staff understand the political realities. They don't teach this stuff in planning school.
  8. Monitor any contact between your staff and the elected officials. You don't want to stifle this contact but you do need to stay in the loop.
  9. As a director, decide early in your career if you are going to fold your opinion when the word comes down from the majority on an issue. I suggest you be politically sensitive but in the final analysis give your best judgment. Be aware, once you go down the other road you can't easily go back.
  10. Build personal relations with the elected officials. This doesn't mean playing golf with them. It does mean finding ways for them to see you as a person and you to see them the same way.

Reader Responses

Great resource with this tip. I have some discomfort with #10 on occasion (Build personal relations with the elected officials. This doesn't mean playing golf with them. It does mean finding ways for them to see you as a person and you to see them the same way.) as I don't want to compromise my neutral/non-political role. Needless to say, your point is well taken. I enjoyed your Complete Management Course for Planning Directors in Raleigh, though unable to attend the second day given the sudden death of a co-worker's wife. Day one was helpful as you offered ideas that were different than mine, and some affirmation of practices and attitudes. I was most impressed with your bibliography and sources. I'd welcome any more recent employee surveys that you may come across.

Steven Finn
Johnston, North Carolina


The hot topic message on political skills was GREAT. Well done! It should be published somewhere. I believe you captured a top 10 list to be an effective planning professional. It also helps you maintain job longevity and program success. I think you did a good service to planners in the trenches in circulating the list. If it is characteristic of the information in your Management Course, the training should be very powerful.

K.L. Cubic
Douglas County, Oregon


If Not Golf, What??

It's a reality of life that many of those in power do play golf, and that a shared game or two builds valuable personal relationships. If I were younger, I'd learn. I realize that it's never too late to learn, but if you're not at or near the beginning of your career, it's difficult to learn to play well enough so you're not a drag on the golf course. I think that would be worse than not playing at all.

So what's the alternative? If you're a different gender from your boss, it may not be that easy to "do lunch," which may be a good alternative in some situations. What about involvement in civic projects that may be of interest to the official(s)? Or joining a club/organization with the movers and shakers? Any merit to those or other suggestions?

Have a great holiday season, and keep the advice coming!

Nancy Brown

Zucker's Additional Comments

Nancy,

In one of my jobs I had a person running for City Council on the campaign to fire me. After he was elected, I invited him to lunch and made certain we went to the restaurant where all the politicos and movers and shakers hung out. This created quite a stir and everyone who saw us wondered what we were talking about. This lunch had the desired effect and it cooled off the firing idea.It may not always work, but that time it did.

Paul Zucker


Thank you for the latest Hot Info of the month. I thought you might be interested in something I keep on my bulletin board on this topic. It's called "political values" and is attributed to John Nalbandian with the Department of Public Administration at the University of Kansas. It also seems to have been written with planners in mind. Respecting these values helps to keep me out of trouble.

Frequently when we think of values, qualities like honesty, reliability, love and sincerity come to mind. These are values, deep-seated beliefs that lead to judgments about right and wrong, but they have to do with individuals and how we lead our lives individually.

Political values influence public policy development as opposed to the lives of the individuals who make policy. The primary political value in our culture is responsiveness of governmental officials to public wants and needs. The value of responsiveness is reflected in demands for representation, efficiency, individual rights, and social equity.

Representation - This is the deep-seated belief that government answers to the will of the people through elected representatives. The wishes of citizens should be represented in governing bodies. If a public policy is going to have an impact on a group of citizens, that group should have the opportunity to be heard.

Efficiency - Citizens expect government to be run prudently. This is achieved through cost-consciousness and rational, analytical decision-making and an emphasis on expertise and professionalism, planning and merit.

Individual Rights - Citizens are granted legal rights that protect them from arbitrary decisions by those who govern - both elected and appointed officials. These rights may be expressed in ordinances, statutes and laws, and the constitution. Property rights and civil rights fall into the broader category of individual rights.

Social Equity - Frequently, citizens are treated as members of groups rather than individuals. Sometimes we classify people as veterans, disabled, African American, female and senior citizens rather than as Jose, Mary, Rita and Jacob. As group members they expect treatment equal to members of other groups. And they compare their treatment with that given to members of other groups. For example, people living in one neighborhood expect to receive a level of government services similar to that received in other neighborhoods; older neighborhoods might expect more service.

K. Cannady
Hampton

to top


November 2002 - Photosynthesis For Planners

From Training, May 2002

The workplace is showing signs of experiencing a collective "nervous breakdown," according to research done by Integra Realty Services, New York, and Opinion Research Corp, International, Princeton, N.J.

American workers are stressing over security uncertainties and current economic environment. This is translating into greater rates of turnover, absenteeism and lower productivity - the last things America needs while it is slowly begins to recover from the events of recent months.

So why not fill your offices with plants? HR experts are encouraging employers to provide their workers with an environment that is comfortable and will inspire workers on their "off" time. Apparently, this environment is one filled with plants.

Studies from Texas A&M University and Washington State University confirmed that visual exposure to plant settings produced significant recovery from stress within five minutes while enhancing productivity by 12 percent. Another Washington State University study said people exposed to plants demonstrated more positive emotions such as happiness, friendliness and assertiveness. Negative emotions such as sadness and fear decreased.

Green thumb or not, maybe what your office needs is a little photosynthesis within its walls to reduce stress, pump up morale and increase productivity.


Reader Response

I have just returned to work after six weeks of stress leave. I have a 10-foot tall plant in my office,.and there are plants throughout our floor. Maybe it helps, but it isn't enough to cope with masters who expect instant response all day and all night when termination is the result of not meeting their expectations.

Anonymous

to top


October 2002 - Why Should Anyone Be Led By You?

From Sept/Oct 2000 Harvard Business Review by Robert Gaffee and Gareth Jones.

Everyone agrees that leaders need vision, energy, authority and strategic directions. But, the authors found that inspirational leaders share 4 unexpected qualities:

  1. They selectively show their weaknesses. By exposing some vulnerability, they reveal their approachability and humanity.
  2. They rely heavily on intuition to gauge the appropriate timing and course of their actions. Their ability to collect and interpret soft data helps them know just when and how to act.
  3. They manage employees with something we call tough empathy. Inspirational leaders empathize passionately - and realistically - with people, and they care intensely about the work employees do.
  4. They reveal their differences. They capitalize on what's unique about themselves.

The authors also discuss 4 popular myths of leadership:

  1. Everyone can be a leader. Not true. Many executives don't have the self-knowledge or the authenticity necessary for leadership. Individuals must also want to be leaders, and many talented employees are not interested in shouldering that responsibility.
  2. Leaders deliver business results. Not always. If results were always a matter of good leadership, picking leaders would be easy. Businesses in quasi-monopolistic industries can often do very well with competent management rather than great leadership.
  3. People who get to the top are leaders. Not necessarily. One of the most persistent misperceptions is that people in leadership positions are leaders. But people who make it to the top may have done so because of political acumen, not necessarily because of true leadership quality. What's more, real leaders are found all over the organization, from the executive suite to the shop floor. By definition, leaders are simply people who have followers, and rank doesn't have much to do with that.
  4. Leaders are great coaches. Rarely. A whole cottage industry has grown up around the teaching that good leaders ought to be good coaches. But that thinking assumes that a single person can both inspire the troops and impart technical skills. Of course, it's possible that great leaders may also be great coaches, but we see that only occasionally. More typical are leaders like Steve Jobs whose distinctive strengths lie in their ability to excite others through their vision rather than through their coaching talent.

to top


September 2002 - Be Careful With Your Values

"Take a look at this list of corporate values: Communication, Respect, Integrity, Excellence. They sound pretty good, don't they? Strong, concise, meaningful. Maybe they even resemble your own departments values, the ones you spent so much time writing, debating, and revising. If so, you should be nervous. These are the corporate values of Enron, as stated in the company's 2000 annual report. And as events have shown, they're not meaningful; they're meaningless."

In our experience, most government value statements are bland, toothless, or just plain dishonest. "Empty values statements create cynical and dispirited employees, alienate customers, and undermine managerial credibility." Cookie-cutter values don't set a department apart from others; they make it fade into the crowd.

"Values can set your department or city apart from the others by clarifying your identity and serving as a rallying point for employees. But coming up with strong values- and sticking to them- requires real guts. Indeed, an organization considering a values initiative must first come to terms with the fact that, when properly practiced, values inflict pain. They make some employees feel like outcasts. They limit an organization's strategic and operational freedom and constrain the behavior of its people. They leave executives open to heavy criticism for even minor violations. And they demand constant vigilance."

What's the first thing many directors do after they decide to embark on a values initiative? They either hand off the effort to the HR people or have a staff retreat. They use the initiative as a feel-good effort. They roll out surveys and hold lots of meetings to gather input and build consensus. "That's precisely the wrong approach. Values initiatives have nothing to do with building consensus-they're about imposing a set of fundamental, strategically sound beliefs on a broad group of people." Surveying all employees about what values they believe the company should adopt is a bad idea for two reasons. First, it integrates suggestions from many employees who probably don't belong at the company in the first place. And second, it creates the false impression that all input it equally valuable.

The best value efforts are driven by the department head and a handful of key employees. Managers also need to understand that a good values program is like a fine wine; it's never rushed.

The above is extracted from the Harvard Business Review, July 2002, "Make Your Values Mean Something" by Patrick M. Lencioni. The entire article is worth your reading.

to top


August 2002 ­ Multiple Permits - Multiple Jurisdictions

You may find this hard to believe, but four Washington State communities have combined part of their permitting functions.

On July 22, the ePermits online application for Kirkland, Mercer Island, Issaquah and Bellevue went live. For the first time, that we're aware of, citizens and contractors can apply for multiple permits from multiple jurisdictions, make a single payment and receive the permits online. A truly cutting edge business application.

Individually, the cities could have each launched their own ePermits application. While this would have been a great customer service enhancement for each city, the eGov Alliance is taking customer service to a new, much higher level. In addition to serving its customers better, it has established the ground work for other online services and are significantly lowering the cost of online services.

The group hopes to bring our other partner cities on board. Sammamish has already put together much of their content and is beginning to work on business processes. The Building Officials from eight cities are scheduled to meet in August to formalize plans to move forward.

To see the application, click here. Select the "Application" tab at the top of the page, then select Apply Now!

To run through some of the application process, select "Apply for Permit Now" under Property Owner Options. Since property owners do not need to pre-register, it is possible to run through the application process all the way up to payment.

For more information, contact:

John Backman
Administrative Services Director
Planning & Community Development
PO Box 90012
Bellevue, WA 98009-9012
425-452-7821

to top


July 2002 ­ Workplace Of The Future

Abstracted from Management Review, January 2000

What will the workplace of the future be like? The following scenarios offer some clues. They come from three business visionaries: Leif Edvinson, director of the Skandia Future Center in Vaxholm, Sweden; Caela Farren, CEO of MasteryWorks Inc. in Annandale, Virginia; and Jim O'Connell, a workforce economist and vice president at Ceridian Corp., Minneapolis, Minnesota.

  • Knowledge workers will not have a traditional contractual relationship with employees. Instead, They will rent their professional skills and knowledge on a "freelance" basis to different companies at different times.
  • The corporate headquarters will evolve into "heart centers," where emotional intelligence fuels creativity, innovation and an enterprising spirit.
  • Downsizing, upsizing, rightsizing, growth and stabilization all will be welcome forms of "sizing" companies. People will have coping mechanisms that prepare them for any shift.
  • In the 24/7 global environment, productivity will be driven by speed and efficiency rather than the number of staff hours dedicated to a project.
  • Internet-speed workplaces will radically transform the world of work, making work across multiple time zones and irregular schedules more and more common.
  • People won't work for organizations where they don't get a share of the profits and where work/life balance is not given.
  • Companies will no longer decide which benefits an employee needs. Instead, employees will log on to their company's web site to customize their benefits programs.
  • People will feel an increasing ownership of their destinies, lives and careers. "Living skills" will be just as important as "professional skills."
  • The boundaries between work and school will blur. Learning will be centered more around professions and trades, and there will be more mentor/apprentice relationships, with internet-based coaching provided by people one has never met.
  • A digital divide will emerge, separating employees who are tech-savvy and those who aren't. Smart companies will invest more in human capital and become virtual universities to narrow that gap.
  • The Fortune list of companies will become less of an economic force. There will be new forms of stock trading, where businesses will be valued according to their contributions to the local and global communities.

A note from Paul Zucker to Planners: Since we are supposed to be leaders and futurists, let's see who among you can translate the above into planner specifics. We'll share it with our e-mailers.


Reader Response
I challenged our readers to translate the July information. Mike Percy did a good job of it below:
  1. Communities that have or foster development of mixed-use campuses, at least involving housing, convenience shopping and educational facilities in combination with work place/office-like environments, will have a competitive edge for this new work place.
  2. Traffic patterns will become more chaotic, but much less “peaked.” This will make mass transit more difficult to schedule and roadway systems will have to be actively managed rather than set on fixed time-of-day schedules. There may be less need for large capital roadway improvements (necessitated by need to accommodate peak traffic flows but under-utilized for much of the day), but more need to retro-fit roadways to be “smart” with active traffic control measures that are based on real-time use of the road. Mass transit may be more difficult to adjust real-time due to the need to coordinate schedules on fixed rail or guide ways and to coordinate schedules of drivers/operators (unless, of course, system can be totally automated, which I think is unlikely in the foreseeable future).
  3. Density will become important to provide nexus of various services, which will run into the traditional oppositions to density and height. It will also run into real difficulties of short term impacts of that density overwhelming localized infrastructure until a broader pattern of land use nodes becomes more broadly used and the lifestyles of the occupants adjust to having services provided in a high density “village” rather than in a widely spread-out, car-oriented community.
  4. Sound insulation, light control, and a balanced set of indoor and outdoor recreation opportunities will become very important to accommodate people’s varying work and home schedules.
  5. Transit will be more difficult to organize since people’s destinations will continually change. This may emphasize more flexible forms of mass transit like buses rather than fixed systems like rail.
  6. The gap between haves and have-nots may get much worse, but may shift from traditional racial or economic background lines to degree-of-technical savvy lines. On the Internet, you can’t tell a person’s racial or economic history, only their published technical training and their ability to solve problems quickly (“at Internet speed”). Because of the ever-increasing speed of the new workplace, there will be less and less time forgiveness for someone to learn to solve a problem, to learn to compete in this economy.
  7. There will also be less time (and with constantly shifting staffing, less human opportunity) to develop and maintain a corporate culture. People may become committed to the task and to those on the “task force,” but not to the organization. With shifting schedules, and no long-term loyalties to organization or work team (your partner today may well be your competitor tomorrow), it will also be more difficult to form other types of communities, whether organized around home life activities, school organizations, or the home/work place village. It will be harder for planners and other community organizers to find times, or a consistent group of people, for public hearings, community boards and commissions, or other civic duties/activities. On the other hand, short-term, ad hoc committees or task forces may become much easier to set up as employees insist on a better balance of work and non-work activities.
  8. Long range planning of either physical facilities or organizational activities becomes much more difficult due both to the rapidly increasing rate of change, and to the decreased availability of people and organizations with long-time frame points of view. Long range planning will need to focus on creating long-life bare bones infrastructure facilities that have a tremendous amount of built-in flexibility. For example, land use planning will need to focus on identifying sets of mutually compatible uses that have compatible infrastructure needs, and one of which can go into a given spot at any time.

Just a few thoughts from a practicing long range planner.

Michael Percy
City of Mountain View

to top


June 2002 ­ Turnover

Every planning client we have is complaining about staff turnover. Check out these six myths of turnover.

  1. People stay because they are loyal to the organization.
    Workers today are loyal to their careers. Don't expect retention based on loyalty alone.
  2. Every worker will leave if the price is right.
    In fact, money is seldom the deal breaker.
  3. Demographics drive the decision to leave.
    Not every Generation Xer will leave.
  4. The departure of key people is a surprise.
    It seldom is, and the signs are there all along.
  5. Turnovers are a series of isolated cases.
    In fact, resignations tend to run in bunches. Be prepared.
  6. Your overall turnover rate is a measure of success.
    The important statistic isn't how many have left. What is important is whether you are experiencing flight at the top.

to top


May 2002 - Getting Your Department From Good To Great

I've been a proponent of the need to set a clear Mission for your department as a key to your success. Although I continue to believe a clear Mission is needed, a new book on the market has raised a number of intriguing additional thoughts. The book is Good To Great by Jim Collins, Harper Business, 2001. In this book Collins suggests First Who…Then What. He suggests that the great companies first got the right people on the bus (and the wrong people off) and then figured out where to drive it. The rational for this approach is:

  • If you begin with the who, rather than the what, you can more easily adapt to a changing world.
  • If you have the right people on the bus, the problem of how to motivate and manage people largely goes away.
  • If you have the wrong people, it doesn't matter whether you discover the right direction-you still won't have a great company.

To accomplish this he suggests:

  • When in doubt, don't hire; keep looking.
  • When you know you need to make a people change, act.
  • Put your best people on your biggest opportunities, not your biggest problems.
  • Most companies build their bureaucratic rules to manage a small percentage of the wrong people, which in turn drives away the right people.
  • Fill your culture with self-disciplined people who are willing to go to extreme lengths to fulfill their responsibilities.

Reader Responses

I didn't take the opportunity to get into the first round of this issue, but welcome the opportunity now. I believe the key to moving from good to great is having the guts and self confidence to hire people better than you are who do not agree with you but are willing to respectfully disagree. To go from good to great, everyone in the organization, especially the titular leader, has to grow, recognize their own limits and shortcomings, test their limits, and constantly risk failure.

Larry Gerckens, FAICP


Thanks for your message. When I was in private practice, I use to interview professionals who did not necessarily fit the job I had open because I would rather mold the job to fit the good person that had applied. In public service, our hiring rules have gotten so restrictive that I have lost some of the flexibility I had in the past. Keep up the good work. We need these insights from others.

Stanley L. Klemetson, Ph.D.
Pleasant Grove City, UT


I like these! Problem is that senior management has to understand them, embrace them and then allow the right people to get the job done without micromanaging them.

Michael A. Harper, AICP Planning Manager
Washoe County, NV


Hello Paul. Thanks again for your timely contributions to relevant thought. I have not had the benefit of reading the book you referenced. However, the philosophy is being tried. We are using a form of the “Who then What" concept. When we have hired people with good skills, knowledge and abilities, they are performing well having then to learn about where we are going. We are shaping our organization around our personnel, our strategic mission that targets the customer base according to the demand for services and products. The rationale for the “Who then What” concept and the methods to accomplish it have been tried, more or less. We would need to make adjustments to more consciously consider our culture, hiring practices, changed staff (eliminations), and especially, putting our best people on the “biggest opportunities” not “biggest problems." How does one test for “self-disciplined people” as a matter of the interview process, aside from checking references? Overall, these suggestions are well received by me.

Thanks.

Raymond White
Dekalb County, GA


Old Saying “The biggest enemy of Great is Good."

Al Solis


I agree with this completely. No matter how good a manager you are, if you don’t surround yourself with good people (subordinates, peers AND superiors!) your organization will fail. If you do manage to attract and keep good people, you can hardly help but succeed. After almost 20 years of management experience, I really believe it is that simple.

Robert Atallo, AICP Planning Director
Madison, Alabama

to top


April 2002- What Are You Reading?

In my consulting practice I am working with hundreds of Planning Directors and other government managers. Almost without exception, I find these managers are not reading management material. Are you one of them? I believe you should be reading at least several management books a year along with several management-related periodicals.

Start with two of my current favorites, First Break All The Rules and How To Be A Star At Work. If you feel either of these is a waste of your time, send me the book and I'll pay you for it. For periodicals, I suggest The Harvard Business Review, Business Week, Training, Governing and Government Technology.

I'll also continue to share some of my reading with you in this space each month. For example, Spring 2002 Business Week has an article, "What Makes A Boffo Brand." This article talks about the popular topic of product branding. The topic has even made it to APA that is studying how to use branding to help planning. The article is based on a new book, A New Brand World, which I've not yet read. However, I was struck by the author's interview with Starbucks' branding expert when asked, "What was it that was most important to Starbucks' success?" His answer, "Everything matters." Seems to me there is a lesson here for Planners.


Reader Responses

I like the idea of hearing more about what others are reading. Speaking for myself (although I suspect many share this trait), I find it very difficult to keep up with all the books, articles, journals and magazines an excellent planning director should keep up with! There’s just too much stuff out there! For the longest time, I’ve worked to keep an hour of my day for reading some of this. But as we all know, sometimes the day just escapes our reach (wouldn’t Stephen Covey be disappointed?!).

The other thing is that the successful planning director has to read a tremendous variety of materials. I agree, we need to read more management materials. But we have to keep up on technology, demography, public policy, emerging economic trends, and nine-thousand other topics! Being a planning director is one of the last great “generalist” jobs - it requires a real “renaissance (wo)man” to do the job well!

[Sidebar: Ever wonder why more graduate planning programs don’t have at least one course on how to be a planning manager/director? Nothing that deals with HR, or political reality orientation! When I was in grad school I was fortunate enough to have Bruce McClendon and Ray Quay as adjuncts, and they used us to “test” the Mastering Change book. I use that along with “What Your Planning Professors Forgot to Tell You" in my own adjunct “reality orientation” courses!]

I’d love to see readers contribute short reviews of books they've read. Maybe I’d be inspired to pick it up - or maybe I’d have to be satisfied with reading vicariously!

The Alliance for Regional Stewardship has done this on occasion, and I find the results interesting.

Me? I’m currently reading Michael Moore’s Stupid White Men, have started The Leader’s Companion by J. Thomas Wren, Place Matters by Deier, Mollenkopf & Swanstrom, City Making by Gerald Frug, and When Faster Harder Smarter is Not Enough by Kathryn D. Cramer… Maybe I should slow down?!

David S. Boyd, AICP
FOCUS St. Louis


I am reading Dante's Inferno, as are many other staffers in the Chicago office of the American Planning Association as part of a reading group.

Stuart Meck, FAICP Principal Investigator
Growing Smart Project

I have just finished reading a wonderful book that sort of fits into the "management" category, although I would recommend it to anyone. The Heart Aroused: Poetry and the Preservation of the Soul in Corporate America by David Whyte. Although I don't work in corporate America, working in a city government isn't that different. One of the things I have noticed about planners is that many of us love what we do, our work has a greater purpose than providing a paycheck, and we try to bring ourselves (our souls) into the work that we do. This book is a wonderful way to explore these thoughts with yourself. The author uses poetry to tell us lessons about ourselves and the work that we can do.

Sarah More
Tucson, AZ

to top


March 2002 - Wisdom Of Jack Welch

Now that Jack Welch has left GE and his book is out, it seems like he's continually in the business news. This is a good time to revisit his six rules. Paul Zucker's comments for planning are in paranthesis.

  1. Control your destiny or someone else will. (Know when it's time to move on.)
  2. Face reality as it is, not as it was or you wish it were. (You work for government-get over it.)
  3. Be candid with everyone. (Be particularly candid with employees.)
  4. Change before you have to. (Don't wait for the City Manager or City Council.)
  5. If you don't have advantage, don't compete. (The field of planning gives us the advantage-use it.)
  6. Don't manage, lead. (Most of us need to do both-but there is a difference.)

to top


January 2002 - Productivity And Pride

Based on Employee Insights 2000 survey of 1,300 people. Click here for survey.

What would boost productivity?

44% - Being able to do my work without having to deal with workplace bureaucracy.
29% - Knowing that my job has a large purpose.
18% - Having clear work-related goals.
9% - Seeing with my own eyes the results of my efforts.

Contributing to pride:

72% - The work I do is very important or important.
23% - My work is a mix - half is important, half is busywork.
5% - My work is mostly or entirely busywork.